Global X Uranium ETF
ALTAR
Score™
3.4% info Recommen-
dation
UNDERWEIGHT
2020E    2021E
P/E
ratio
17.2x P/Sales
ratio
0.6x
P/BV
ratio
1.0x Div.
yield
2.8%


  • Description
  • Performance
  • Comps
  • premium Fundamentals
  • premium Valuation
  • premium Rating
Global X Uranium ETF seeks to track the performance of Solactive Uranium Index.

FUND BASICS
Category Global Equities
Fund Sponsor Global X Management Co LLC
Website www.globalxfunds.com
Inception date Nov 05, 2010
Assets (mns) $157
Currency USD
Expense ratio 69 bp
Distributions Annually

FUND STRUCTURE
Regulation Open-Ended Fund
Custodian Brown Brothers Harriman & Co
Weighting Market Cap
Index replication Full
Uses derivatives No
Options available Yes

SECTOR BREAKDOWN

 


CONSTITUENT BREAKDOWN
No. of constituents 30
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) $18,602
Large cap (>$10bn) 44.7%
Mid cap ($2-10bn) 24.9%
Small cap (<$2bn) 30.5%
Developed mkts 80.5%
Emerging mkts 19.6%

TOP TEN HOLDINGS
CAMECO CORP 20.9 %
BARRICK GOLD CORP 5.5 %
ITOCHU CORP 4.7 %
MACQUARIE GROUP LTD 4.7 %
CHEIL INDUSTRIES INC 4.7 %
SUMITOMO CORP 4.6 %
RIO TINTO PLC 4.3 %
BHP BILLITON PLC 4.2 %
MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES 4.1 %
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONST 4.0 %
Total 61.7 %

TOP COUNTRY EXPOSURE
CANADA 36.9 %
SOUTH KOREA 14.2 %
JAPAN 13.5 %
BRITAIN 8.5 %
AUSTRALIA 5.2 %
SOUTH AFRICA 0.6 %
UNITED STATES 0.6 %
CHINA 0.2 %
HONG KONG 0.1 %


HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE info

  Custom date range Compare to  
  thru


Standardized Annual Returns (thru January 31)
Year-to-date 1 year 5 years 10 years Since Incep.
-8.8% -19.1% 2.6% -- -15.6%

Market Correlations
versus... Beta R-squared
S&P500 0.81 16%
MSCI EAFE 0.92 17%
MSCI Emg. Mkts. 0.65 15%

Technical Indicators
Recent close $10.28
30d moving avg. $10.74
Annualized volatility 24.5%
Short interest (ETF) 0.1%
Relative strength (RSI) 48

Liquidity measures
Avg. volume (thou.) 120
Turnover 0.8%
Bid/Ask (% of price) 0.16%
ADV underlying (mns) $625

Distributions


FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

Below is a list of 20 potential alternatives to the Global X Uranium ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with URA. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.

Benchmark ticker: URA Expense: 69 bp ALTAR Score™: 3.4%


ALTERNATIVE ETFs BASED ON OVERLAP WITH URA
Ticker Fund
Name
Overlap1
vs URA
(%)
Expense
ratio
(bp)
Savings
vs URA
(bp)
ALTAR
Score™
(%)
ALTAR
vs URA
(%)
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF 8.5 39 30 8.7 +5.3
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF 7.3 46 23 6.8 +3.4
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF 6.1 39 30 3.4 +0.0
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF 5.7 35 34 4.6 +1.2
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF 5.5 50 19 3.0 -0.4
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF 5.2 39 30 10.0 +6.7
GUNR Flexshares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources 5.2 46 23 6.4 +3.0
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund 4.9 58 11 6.3 +3.0
INTF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Intl ETF 4.6 30 39 8.3 +4.9
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF 4.5 50 19 7.7 +4.3
QGBR SPDR MSCI UK StrategicFactors ETF 4.3 14 55 8.2 +4.8
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF 4.3 55 14 9.5 +6.2
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF 4.2 9 60 8.1 +4.7
GRES IQ Global Resources ETF 4.0 77 -8 7.1 +3.7
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF 3.8 45 24 10.5 +7.1
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund 3.6 80 -11 10.6 +7.2
IDY Pacific Global International Equity Income ETF 3.5 39 30 8.7 +5.3
FKO First Trust South Korea AlphadDEX Fund 3.4 80 -11 10.6 +7.2
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Hedged Equity ETF 3.4 20 49 8.8 +5.4
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund 3.3 48 21 9.1 +5.7

1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.

Content on this tab for subscribers only**

RESULTS & ESTIMATES

  2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020E 2021E
Sales per share ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Earnings per share ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Dividends per share info ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Book value per share ** ** ** ** ** ** **

 

Sales per share growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%
EPS growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%

Sales per share growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%
EPS growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%

OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS

Long term EPS growth est. **%   Debt-to-equity **x
Asset turnover **%   Assets-to-equity **x

Return on equity

Revision activity*
*Six months ago = 100

Net margins

Compound annual growth rates

Content on this tab for subscribers only

VALUATION METRICS
  2019 2020E 2021E
Price-to-sales ** ** **
Price-to-earnings ** ** **
Price-to-cash flow ** ** **
Price-to-growth ** ** **
Price-to-book value ** ** **
Yield ** ** **

Historical valuation trends

Forward
multiple:
Global X Uranium ETF
Relative
to:
S&P500 MSCI EAFE MSCI Emg. Mkts. Other ETF:

UNDERWEIGHT

Below average appreciation potential. A rating of UNDERWEIGHT is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the 2nd quintile (ranking higher than only 20%-40%) of their category. Typically, funds in this category consist of stocks trading at relatively expensive valuations and/or having below-average fundamentals.

ALTAR Score™


Calculation of ALTAR Score™
Avg. Return on Equity 4.0 %
Divided by: Fwd. P/BV 1.0 x
Less: Expense ratio 69 bp
Equals: ALTAR Score 3.4 %
info More information on ALTAR Score™

MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY info

CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
COMPOSITE
RATING
1.54 CATEGORY
AVERAGE
1.55
 
The composite rating is a weighted average of analysts' consensus recommendations for individual ETF constituents, based on the following scale:

BUY = 1; OVERWEIGHT = 1.5, HOLD = 2; UNDERWEIGHT = 2.5; and SELL = 3.

Readers are cautioned that because analyst ratings tend to be inflated, the composite score may be more useful as a relative measure of sentiment between funds rather than as a stand-alone recommendation.
 

 

See RATING tab for calculation of ALTAR Score™
Risk & reward. Uses std. dev. as proxy for risk, ALTAR Score™ for return forecast.
Dividends paid by constituents to the fund. May differ from actual distributions to shareholders due to constituent changes, timing issues or other factors.
Monthly returns based on changes in price plus dividends. May differ from daily returns reported by funds. See below for standardized returns.