Invesco S&P Equal Weight Technology
ALTAR
Score™
6.5% info Recommen-
dation
OVERWEIGHT
2019E    2020E
P/E
ratio
19.1x P/Sales
ratio
3.0x
P/BV
ratio
4.5x Div.
yield
1.4%


  • Description
  • Performance
  • Comps
  • premium Fundamentals
  • premium Valuation
  • premium Rating
Invesco S&P Equal Weight Technology ETF is an exchange-traded fund incorporated in the USA. The Fund's objective is to replicate the S&P Equal Weight Technology Index.

FUND BASICS
Category US Equities
Fund Sponsor Security Investors LLC
Website guggenheiminvestments.com
Inception date Nov 07, 2006
Assets (mns) $1,775
Currency USD
Expense ratio 40 bp
Distributions Quarterly

FUND STRUCTURE
Regulation Open-Ended Fund
Custodian State Street Bank & Trust
Weighting Equal
Index replication Full
Uses derivatives No
Options available No

SECTOR BREAKDOWN

 


CONSTITUENT BREAKDOWN
No. of constituents 69
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) $92,950
Large cap (>$10bn) 90.3%
Mid cap ($2-10bn) 9.7%
Small cap (<$2bn) 0.0%
Developed mkts 100.0%
Emerging mkts 0.0%

TOP TEN HOLDINGS
QORVO INC 1.9 %
FORTINET INC 1.8 %
XEROX CORP 1.8 %
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.8 %
CDW CORP/DE 1.7 %
APPLE INC 1.7 %
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC 1.7 %
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.7 %
LAM RESEARCH CORP 1.7 %
KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION 1.6 %
Total 17.3 %

TOP COUNTRY EXPOSURE
UNITED STATES 95.7 %
IRELAND 2.9 %
SWITZERLAND 1.3 %








HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE info

  Custom date range Compare to  
  thru


Standardized Annual Returns (thru October 31)
Year-to-date 1 year 5 years 10 years Since Incep.
30.7% 21.2% 17.3% 17.4% 11.4%

Market Correlations
versus... Beta R-squared
S&P500 1.23 85%
MSCI EAFE 1.10 58%
MSCI Emg. Mkts. 0.80 50%

Technical Indicators
Recent close $191.92
30d moving avg. $183.04
Annualized volatility 16.1%
Short interest (ETF) 1.6%
Short interest (Underlying) 4.0%
Relative strength (RSI) 68

Liquidity measures
Avg. volume (thou.) 38
Turnover 0.4%
Bid/Ask (% of price) 0.04%
ADV underlying (mns) $32,957

Distributions


FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

Below is a list of 20 potential alternatives to the Invesco S&P Equal Weight Technology ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with RYT. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.

Benchmark ticker: RYT Expense: 40 bp ALTAR Score™: 6.5%


ALTERNATIVE ETFs BASED ON OVERLAP WITH RYT
Ticker Fund
Name
Overlap1
vs RYT
(%)
Expense
ratio
(bp)
Savings
vs RYT
(bp)
ALTAR
Score™
(%)
ALTAR
vs RYT
(%)
JHMT John Hancock Multifactor Technology 52.3 40 0 6.0 -0.5
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR 45.9 13 27 5.5 -1.0
SPHB Invesco S&P 500 High Beta 44.6 25 15 6.3 -0.2
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Info Technology 42.9 8 32 5.4 -1.1
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ 100 Tech 42.7 57 -17 6.0 -0.5
VGT Vanguard Info Tech ETF 42.6 10 30 5.4 -1.1
IXN iShares S&P Global Technology 41.1 46 -6 5.3 -1.2
FXL First Trust Technology Alphadex 39.7 63 -23 5.5 -1.0
IGM iShares S&P N. American Technology 38.8 46 -6 4.6 -1.9
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats 35.4 45 -5 5.2 -1.3
QQEW First Trust NASDAQ 100 Equal Weight 33.7 60 -20 6.0 -0.5
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weight 33.7 35 5 6.3 -0.2
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology 32.9 18 22 4.8 -1.7
IYW iShares US Technology 31.2 42 -2 5.1 -1.4
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend 30.2 50 -10 6.6 +0.1
QTUM Defiance Quantum 29.6 40 0 6.3 -0.2
SLT Salt TruBeta High Exposure 27.3 29 11 6.4 -0.1
CHGX Change Finance Diversified Impact US Large Cap Fossil Fuel 26.4 49 -9 6.2 -0.4
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology 26.4 35 5 5.5 -1.0
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation 25.4 60 -20 6.6 +0.1

1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.

Content on this tab for subscribers only**

RESULTS & ESTIMATES

  2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019E 2020E
Sales per share ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Earnings per share ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Dividends per share info ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Book value per share ** ** ** ** ** ** **

 

Sales per share growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%
EPS growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%

Sales per share growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%
EPS growth   **% **% **% **% **% **%

OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS

Long term EPS growth est. **%   Debt-to-equity **x
Asset turnover **%   Assets-to-equity **x

Return on equity

Revision activity*
*Six months ago = 100

Net margins

Compound annual growth rates

Content on this tab for subscribers only

VALUATION METRICS
  2018 2019E 2020E
Price-to-sales ** ** **
Price-to-earnings ** ** **
Price-to-cash flow ** ** **
Price-to-growth ** ** **
Price-to-book value ** ** **
Yield ** ** **

Historical valuation trends

Forward
multiple:
Invesco S&P Equal Weight Technology
Relative
to:
S&P500 MSCI EAFE MSCI Emg. Mkts. Other ETF:

OVERWEIGHT

Above average appreciation potential. A rating of OVERWEIGHT is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the 4th quintile (ranking higher than 60%-80%) of their category. Typically, funds in this category consist of stocks trading at attractive valuations and/or having above-average fundamentals.

ALTAR Score™


Calculation of ALTAR Score™
Avg. Return on Equity 26.5 %
Divided by: Fwd. P/BV 3.8 x
Less: Expense ratio 40 bp
Equals: ALTAR Score 6.5 %
info More information on ALTAR Score™

MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY info

CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
COMPOSITE
RATING
1.58 CATEGORY
AVERAGE
1.55
 
The composite rating is a weighted average of analysts' consensus recommendations for individual ETF constituents, based on the following scale:

BUY = 1; OVERWEIGHT = 1.5, HOLD = 2; UNDERWEIGHT = 2.5; and SELL = 3.

Readers are cautioned that because analyst ratings tend to be inflated, the composite score may be more useful as a relative measure of sentiment between funds rather than as a stand-alone recommendation.
 

 

See RATING tab for calculation of ALTAR Score™
Risk & reward. Uses std. dev. as proxy for risk, ALTAR Score™ for return forecast.
Dividends paid by constituents to the fund. May differ from actual distributions to shareholders due to constituent changes, timing issues or other factors.
Monthly returns based on changes in price plus dividends. May differ from daily returns reported by funds. See below for standardized returns.