Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
|
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
Fundamentals
Valuation
Rating
The Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. |
Category | US Equities |
Fund Sponsor | Global X |
Website | www.globalxfunds.com |
Inception date | Apr 18, 2019 |
Assets (mns) | $1,300 |
Currency | USD |
Expense ratio | 60 bp |
Distributions | Monthly |
Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
Custodian | |
Weighting | Market Cap |
Index replication | |
Uses derivatives | Yes |
Options available | Yes |
No. of constituents | 2 |
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $3,197 |
Large cap (>$10bn) | 1.4% |
Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 61.8% |
Small cap (<$2bn) | 37.8% |
Developed mkts | 101.3% |
Emerging mkts | 0.1% |
GLOBAL X RUSSELL 2000 ETF | 108.6 % |
INHIBRX INC | 0.0 % |
CASH | -8.4 % | Total | 100.2 % |
---|
![]() |
UNITED STATES | 103.4 % |
![]() |
BERMUDA | 1.3 % |
![]() |
BRITAIN | 0.8 % |
![]() |
CANADA | 0.5 % |
![]() |
CAYMAN ISLANDS | 0.5 % |
![]() |
IRELAND | 0.4 % |
![]() |
PUERTO RICO | 0.3 % |
![]() |
BRAZIL | 0.3 % |
![]() |
ISRAEL | 0.2 % |
![]() |
INDIA | 0.1 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 

Custom date range | Compare to | ||
thru |
Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
-9.5% | -2.8% | 7.0% | -- | 2.0% |
versus... | Beta | R-squared |
S&P500 | 0.53 | 63% |
MSCI EAFE | 0.42 | 41% |
MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 0.24 | 14% |
Recent close | $14.60 |
30d moving avg. | $14.50 |
Annualized volatility | 11.1% |
Short interest (ETF) | 4.3% |
Relative strength (RSI) | 46 |
Avg. volume (thou.) | 630 |
Turnover | 0.7% |
Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.06% |
ADV underlying (mns) | $37,220 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 1 potential alternatives to the Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with RYLD. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
Benchmark ticker: | RYLD | Expense: | 60 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 4.5% |
Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs RYLD (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs RYLD (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs RYLD (%) |
RYLG | Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 104.1 | 60 | 0 | 4.4 | -0.1 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share ![]() |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
*Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
---|---|---|---|
Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
Forward multiple: |
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | |||
Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
UNDERWEIGHT |
Below average appreciation potential. A rating of UNDERWEIGHT is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the 2nd quintile (ranking higher than only 20%-40%) of their category. Typically, funds in this category consist of stocks trading at relatively expensive valuations and/or having below-average fundamentals. |
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
![]() |
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|