ETF Research Center

The ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF tracks a market-cap-weighted index of global firms engaged in the legal cultivation, production, marketing or distribution of cannabis, cannabinoids or tobacco products.lf

FUND BASICS
Category	US Equities
Fund Sponsor	ETF Managers Group
Website	www.etfmj.com
Inception date	Dec 03, 2015
Assets (mns)	$113
Currency	USD
Expense ratio	75 bp
Distributions	Quarterly

FUND STRUCTURE
Regulation	Open-Ended Fund
Custodian
Weighting	Market Cap
Index replication
Uses derivatives	No
Options available	Yes

SECTOR BREAKDOWN

CONSTITUENT BREAKDOWN
No. of constituents	8
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns)	$154
Large cap (>$10bn)	0.0%
Mid cap ($2-10bn)	0.0%
Small cap (<$2bn)	100.0%
Developed mkts	100.0%
Emerging mkts	0.0%

TOP TEN HOLDINGS
Total	99.9 %
AMPLIFY SEYMOUR CANNABIS ETF	53.2 %
TILRAY, INC.	12.6 %
SUNDIAL GROWERS INC.	8.9 %
CRONOS GROUP INC	8.3 %
AURORA CANNABIS INC.	5.4 %
HIGH TIDE, INC.	3.9 %
CANOPY GROWTH CORP	3.6 %
ORGANIGRAM HOLDINGS INC	2.1 %
VILLAGE FARMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.	1.5 %
CASH & OTHER	0.4 %

TOP COUNTRY EXPOSURE
	CANADA	41.0 %
	MEXICO	0.0 %

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE info

	Custom date range	Compare to
	thru

Standardized Annual Returns (thru February 28)
Year-to-date	1 year	5 years	10 years	Since Incep.
904.0%	617.4%	15.0%	--	3.7%

Market Correlations
versus...	Beta	R-squared
S&P500	-1.56	0%
MSCI EAFE	3.74	1%
MSCI Emg. Mkts.	2.11	0%

Technical Indicators
Recent close	$19.66
30d moving avg.	$18.69
Annualized volatility	561.1%
Short interest (ETF)	3.2%
Short interest (Underlying)	5.3%
Relative strength (RSI)	69

Liquidity measures
Avg. volume (thou.)	68
Turnover	1.2%
Bid/Ask (% of price)	0.61%
ADV underlying (mns)	$1,088

Distributions

FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS

Below is a list of 29 potential alternatives to the ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with MJ. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.

Benchmark ticker:

MJ

Expense:

75 bp

ALTAR Score™:

-17.4%

ALTERNATIVE ETFs BASED ON OVERLAP WITH MJ
Ticker	Fund Name	Overlap¹ vs MJ (%)	Expense ratio (bp)	Savings vs MJ (bp)	ALTAR Score™ (%)	ALTAR vs MJ (%)
TOKE	Cambria Cannabis ETF	14.5	42	33	1.5	+18.9
YOLO	AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF	11.9	103	-28	-4.5	+12.9
EATV	VegTech Plant-based Innovation & Climate ETF	0.6	75	0	5.4	+22.8
SFYF	SoFi Social 50 ETF	0.2	29	46	0.1	+17.5
PRFZ	Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF	0.1	39	36	4.0	+21.4
BBSC	JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	0.0	9	66	4.0	+21.4
GWX	SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF	0.0	40	35	6.7	+24.1
DFIS	Dimensional International Small Cap ETF	0.0	39	36	7.9	+25.2
SCHC	Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF	0.0	11	64	7.1	+24.5
SMLF	iShares U.S. SmallCap Equity Factor ETF	0.0	15	60	6.0	+23.3
ISCV	iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF	0.0	6	69	8.4	+25.8
VSS	Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF	0.0	7	68	7.0	+24.4
ISCB	iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF	0.0	4	71	5.6	+23.0
ONEQ	Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.0	21	54	4.3	+21.6
FHLC	Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	0.0	8	67	5.9	+23.3
ISCG	iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF	0.0	6	69	2.7	+20.1
VHT	Vanguard Health Care ETF	0.0	10	65	5.7	+23.1
DFAI	Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF	0.0	18	57	7.6	+24.9
IDEV	iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	0.0	4	71	7.4	+24.7
DFAX	Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	0.0	30	45	8.6	+26.0
DFIC	Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF	0.0	23	52	7.9	+25.3
IXUS	iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF	0.0	7	68	8.3	+25.7
VEA	Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	0.0	5	70	7.6	+24.9
VT	Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	0.0	7	68	6.4	+23.7
VXUS	Vanguard Total International Stock ETF	0.0	7	68	8.3	+25.7
SPGM	SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	0.0	9	66	6.0	+23.3
TILT	FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund	0.0	25	50	6.0	+23.4
SPDW	SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF	0.0	3	72	7.5	+24.9
VWO	Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	0.0	8	67	10.9	+28.3

¹Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.

Content on this tab for subscribers only**

RESULTS & ESTIMATES

	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024	2025E	2026E
Sales per share	**	**	**	**	**	**	**
Earnings per share	**	**	**	**	**	**	**
Dividends per share	**	**	**	**	**	**	**
Book value per share	**	**	**	**	**	**	**

Sales per share growth		**%	**%	**%	**%	**%	**%
EPS growth		**%	**%	**%	**%	**%	**%

Sales per share growth		**%	**%	**%	**%	**%	**%
EPS growth		**%	**%	**%	**%	**%	**%

OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS

Long term EPS growth est.	**%		Debt-to-equity	**x
Asset turnover	**%		Assets-to-equity	**x

Return on equity

Revision activity*

*Six months ago = 100

Net margins

Compound annual growth rates

Content on this tab for subscribers only

VALUATION METRICS

	2024	2025E	2026E
Price-to-sales	**	**	**
Price-to-earnings	**	**	**
Price-to-cash flow	**	**	**
Price-to-growth	**	**	**
Price-to-book value	**	**	**
Yield	**	**	**

Historical valuation trends

Forward multiple:	ETFMG Alternative Harvest
Relative to:	S&P500	MSCI EAFE	MSCI Emg. Mkts.	Other ETF:

AVOID

Not worthwhile for most investors. A rating of AVOID is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the lowest quintile (the bottom 20%) of their category. Often, funds in this category consist of stocks with little if any history or expectation of profitability, and as a result our fundamentally-driven analysis may not be relevant.

ALTAR Score™

Calculation of ALTAR Score™
Avg. Return on Equity	-9.8	%
Divided by: Fwd. P/BV	0.6	x
Less: Expense ratio	75	bp
Equals: ALTAR Score	-17.4	%

More information on ALTAR Score™

MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY info

CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS

COMPOSITE RATING	1.53	CATEGORY AVERAGE	1.58

The composite rating is a weighted average of analysts' consensus recommendations for individual ETF constituents, based on the following scale: BUY = 1; OVERWEIGHT = 1.5, HOLD = 2; UNDERWEIGHT = 2.5; and SELL = 3. Readers are cautioned that because analyst ratings tend to be inflated, the composite score may be more useful as a relative measure of sentiment between funds rather than as a stand-alone recommendation.