|
ETFMG Alternative Harvest
|
||||||||||||||||||
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
Fundamentals
Valuation
Rating
| The ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF tracks a market-cap-weighted index of global firms engaged in the legal cultivation, production, marketing or distribution of cannabis, cannabinoids or tobacco products.lf |
| Category | US Equities |
| Fund Sponsor | ETF Managers Group |
| Website | www.etfmj.com |
| Inception date | Dec 03, 2015 |
| Assets (mns) | $135 |
| Currency | USD |
| Expense ratio | 75 bp |
| Distributions | Quarterly |
| Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
| Custodian | |
| Weighting | Market Cap |
| Index replication | |
| Uses derivatives | No |
| Options available | Yes |
| No. of constituents | 8 |
| Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $377 |
| Large cap (>$10bn) | 0.0% |
| Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 0.0% |
| Small cap (<$2bn) | 100.0% |
| Developed mkts | 100.0% |
| Emerging mkts | 0.0% |
| AMPLIFY SEYMOUR CANNABIS ETF | 49.1 % |
| TILRAY, INC. | 16.2 % |
| CRONOS GROUP INC | 7.5 % |
| SUNDIAL GROWERS INC. | 6.4 % |
| CANOPY GROWTH CORP | 6.0 % |
| VILLAGE FARMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. | 5.7 % |
| AURORA CANNABIS INC. | 3.8 % |
| HIGH TIDE, INC. | 3.2 % |
| ORGANIGRAM GLOBAL INC | 2.2 % |
| EMPRESAS ICA S.A.B | 0.0 % | Total | 100.0 % |
|---|
| CANADA | 42.8 % | |
| MEXICO | 0.0 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 

| Custom date range | Compare to | ||
| thru |
| Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
| 20.6% | -12.8% | -21.3% | -- | -17.7% |
| versus... | Beta | R-squared |
| S&P500 | -5.48 | 2% |
| MSCI EAFE | 3.15 | 1% |
| MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 1.41 | 0% |
| Recent close | $26.74 |
| 30d moving avg. | $31.51 |
| Annualized volatility | 561.2% |
| Short interest (ETF) | 3.8% |
| Short interest (Underlying) | 5.3% |
| Relative strength (RSI) | 42 |
| Avg. volume (thou.) | 74 |
| Turnover | 1.5% |
| Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.63% |
| ADV underlying (mns) | $1,088 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 21 potential alternatives to the ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with MJ. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
| Benchmark ticker: | MJ | Expense: | 75 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 0.0% |
| Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs MJ (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs MJ (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs MJ (%) |
| YOLO | AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 17.8 | 103 | -28 | -4.8 | -4.8 |
| TOKE | Cambria Cannabis ETF | 17.5 | 42 | 33 | 2.3 | +2.3 |
| SFYF | SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.2 | 29 | 46 | 1.0 | +1.0 |
| PDN | Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-US Small-Mid ETF | 0.2 | 49 | 26 | 6.8 | +6.8 |
| FDTS | First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 0.1 | 80 | -5 | 10.8 | +10.8 |
| BBSC | JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.1 | 9 | 66 | 4.0 | +4.0 |
| PRFZ | Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.0 | 39 | 36 | 4.2 | +4.2 |
| SMLF | iShares U.S. SmallCap Equity Factor ETF | 0.0 | 15 | 60 | 6.0 | +6.0 |
| FHLC | Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 0.0 | 8 | 67 | 5.6 | +5.6 |
| VHT | Vanguard Health Care ETF | 0.0 | 9 | 66 | 5.4 | +5.4 |
| TILT | FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund | 0.0 | 25 | 50 | 5.5 | +5.5 |
| ONEQ | Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.0 | 21 | 54 | 3.7 | +3.7 |
| DFIS | Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 0.0 | 39 | 36 | 7.0 | +7.0 |
| DFAI | Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 0.0 | 18 | 57 | 6.8 | +6.8 |
| DFAX | Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 0.0 | 30 | 45 | 7.5 | +7.5 |
| IDEV | iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 0.0 | 4 | 71 | 6.7 | +6.7 |
| DXIV | Dimensional International Vector Equity ETF | 0.0 | 34 | 41 | 7.4 | +7.4 |
| IXUS | iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 0.0 | 7 | 68 | 7.5 | +7.5 |
| SPGM | SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 0.0 | 9 | 66 | 5.6 | +5.6 |
| SPDW | SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | 0.0 | 3 | 72 | 6.6 | +6.6 |
| DFIC | Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 0.0 | 23 | 52 | 7.1 | +7.1 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share ![]() |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
| EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
| Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
| EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
| Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
| Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
| *Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
| 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
| Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
| Forward multiple: |
ETFMG Alternative Harvest | |||
| Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
AVOID |
| Not worthwhile for most investors. A rating of AVOID is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the lowest quintile (the bottom 20%) of their category. Often, funds in this category consist of stocks with little if any history or expectation of profitability, and as a result our fundamentally-driven analysis may not be relevant. |
|
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|
||||||||||||||
