|
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
|
||||||||||||||||||
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
Fundamentals
Valuation
Rating
| HERD, a fund of funds, provides exposure to large- and small-cap companies in developed markets including the US. Its underlying indexes focus on free cash flow. |
| Category | Global Equities |
| Fund Sponsor | Pacer Financial |
| Website | www.paceretfs.com |
| Inception date | May 03, 2019 |
| Assets (mns) | $102 |
| Currency | USD |
| Expense ratio | 74 bp |
| Distributions | Quarterly |
| Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
| Custodian | |
| Weighting | Tiered |
| Index replication | |
| Uses derivatives | No |
| Options available | No |
| No. of constituents | 7 |
| Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $62,602 |
| Large cap (>$10bn) | 79.2% |
| Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 16.2% |
| Small cap (<$2bn) | 3.4% |
| Developed mkts | 98.0% |
| Emerging mkts | 1.7% |
| PACER DEVELOPED MARKETS INTERNATIO | 20.5 % |
| PACER GLOBAL CASH COWS DIVIDEND ET | 20.1 % |
| PACER US CASH COWS 100 ETF | 19.9 % |
| PACER US CASH COWS GROWTH ETF | 19.9 % |
| PACER US SMALL CAP CASH COWS ETF | 19.6 % |
| CASH & OTHER | 0.0 % | Total | 100.0 % |
|---|
| UNITED STATES | 62.5 % | |
| BRITAIN | 6.6 % | |
| JAPAN | 5.8 % | |
| FRANCE | 4.5 % | |
| SOUTH KOREA | 2.5 % | |
| CANADA | 2.0 % | |
| SWITZERLAND | 2.0 % | |
| GERMANY | 1.9 % | |
| HONG KONG | 1.8 % | |
| IRELAND | 1.7 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 

| Custom date range | Compare to | ||
| thru |
| Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
| 12.2% | 6.7% | 14.8% | -- | 11.3% |
| versus... | Beta | R-squared |
| S&P500 | 0.92 | 63% |
| MSCI EAFE | 0.73 | 50% |
| MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 0.51 | 27% |
| Recent close | $43.12 |
| 30d moving avg. | $42.40 |
| Annualized volatility | 15.6% |
| Short interest (ETF) | 0.0% |
| Relative strength (RSI) | 59 |
| Avg. volume (thou.) | 3 |
| Turnover | 0.1% |
| Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.25% |
| ADV underlying (mns) | $7,667 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 1 potential alternatives to the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with HERD. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
| Benchmark ticker: | HERD | Expense: | 74 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 9.6% |
| Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs HERD (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs HERD (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs HERD (%) |
| RNIN | Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF | 0.1 | 70 | 4 | 10.5 | +0.8 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share ![]() |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
| EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
| Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
| EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
| Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
| Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
| *Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
| 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
| Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
| Forward multiple: |
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
SPECULATIVE |
| Deeply undervalued but risky. A rating of SPECULATIVE is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the top quintile (the top 20%) of their category, indicating exceptional appreciation potential. However, often these are narrowly-focused funds or in industries with structural issues, which may also make them very risky. Nonetheless they may still be useful as part of a well-diversified portfolio. |
|
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|
||||||||||||||
