Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
|
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
Fundamentals
Valuation
Rating
HERD, a fund of funds, provides exposure to large- and small-cap companies in developed markets including the US. Its underlying indexes focus on free cash flow. |
Category | Global Equities |
Fund Sponsor | Pacer Financial |
Website | www.paceretfs.com |
Inception date | May 03, 2019 |
Assets (mns) | $89 |
Currency | USD |
Expense ratio | 74 bp |
Distributions | Quarterly |
Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
Custodian | |
Weighting | Tiered |
Index replication | |
Uses derivatives | No |
Options available | No |
No. of constituents | 5 |
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $60,708 |
Large cap (>$10bn) | 79.2% |
Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 16.2% |
Small cap (<$2bn) | 3.4% |
Developed mkts | 98.0% |
Emerging mkts | 1.7% |
PACER US CASH COWS GROWTH ETF | 21.1 % |
PACER DEVELOPED MARKETS INTERNATIO | 20.4 % |
PACER US SMALL CAP CASH COWS ETF | 20.0 % |
PACER GLOBAL CASH COWS DIVIDEND ET | 19.5 % |
PACER US CASH COWS 100 ETF | 19.1 % |
CASH & OTHER | 0.0 % | Total | 100.0 % |
---|
![]() |
UNITED STATES | 63.7 % |
![]() |
BRITAIN | 6.5 % |
![]() |
JAPAN | 5.5 % |
![]() |
FRANCE | 4.9 % |
![]() |
GERMANY | 2.6 % |
![]() |
SOUTH KOREA | 2.1 % |
![]() |
CANADA | 2.1 % |
![]() |
SWITZERLAND | 1.9 % |
![]() |
HONG KONG | 1.7 % |
![]() |
AUSTRALIA | 1.5 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 

Custom date range | Compare to | ||
thru |
Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
5.1% | 8.0% | 14.2% | -- | 10.6% |
versus... | Beta | R-squared |
S&P500 | 0.92 | 72% |
MSCI EAFE | 0.86 | 66% |
MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 0.62 | 36% |
Recent close | $40.27 |
30d moving avg. | $39.13 |
Annualized volatility | 17.5% |
Short interest (ETF) | 0.1% |
Relative strength (RSI) | 57 |
Avg. volume (thou.) | 9 |
Turnover | 0.4% |
Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.35% |
ADV underlying (mns) | $7,667 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 1 potential alternatives to the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with HERD. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
Benchmark ticker: | HERD | Expense: | 74 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 9.6% |
Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs HERD (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs HERD (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs HERD (%) |
RNIN | Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF | 0.1 | 70 | 4 | 5.0 | -4.5 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share ![]() |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
*Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
---|---|---|---|
Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
Forward multiple: |
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | |||
Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
SPECULATIVE |
Deeply undervalued but risky. A rating of SPECULATIVE is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the top quintile (the top 20%) of their category, indicating exceptional appreciation potential. However, often these are narrowly-focused funds or in industries with structural issues, which may also make them very risky. Nonetheless they may still be useful as part of a well-diversified portfolio. |
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
![]() |
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|