|
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
|
||||||||||||||||||
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
Fundamentals
Valuation
Rating
| GXTG seeks to provide broad exposure to structurally disruptive macro-trends through a portfolio of ETFs selected from the Global X Thematic Growth family. |
| Category | Global Equities |
| Fund Sponsor | Global X |
| Website | www.globalxfunds.com |
| Inception date | Oct 25, 2019 |
| Assets (mns) | $9 |
| Currency | USD |
| Expense ratio | 50 bp |
| Distributions | Semi-annual |
| Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
| Custodian | |
| Weighting | Tiered |
| Index replication | |
| Uses derivatives | No |
| Options available | Yes |
| No. of constituents | 5 |
| Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $260,031 |
| Large cap (>$10bn) | 46.6% |
| Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 39.9% |
| Small cap (<$2bn) | 12.9% |
| Developed mkts | 69.2% |
| Emerging mkts | 30.5% |
| GLOBAL X LITHIUM | 23.0 % |
| GLOBAL X E-COMMERCE ETF | 22.1 % |
| GLOBAL X ART INTEL & TECH | 21.4 % |
| GLOBAL X HYDROGEN ETF | 18.6 % |
| GLOBAL X BLOCKCHAIN ETF | 14.9 % |
| CASH | 0.0 % | Total | 100.0 % |
|---|
| UNITED STATES | 44.3 % | |
| CHINA | 17.0 % | |
| BRITAIN | 7.7 % | |
| SOUTH KOREA | 6.4 % | |
| CANADA | 5.4 % | |
| AUSTRALIA | 4.2 % | |
| JAPAN | 3.6 % | |
| GERMANY | 1.5 % | |
| TAIWAN | 0.9 % | |
| ISRAEL | 0.9 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 

| Custom date range | Compare to | ||
| thru |
| Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
| 8.4% | 0.3% | -8.6% | -- | 0.7% |
| versus... | Beta | R-squared |
| S&P500 | 1.11 | 71% |
| MSCI EAFE | 1.10 | 50% |
| MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 1.14 | 61% |
| Recent close | $25.39 |
| 30d moving avg. | $26.50 |
| Annualized volatility | 23.3% |
| Short interest (ETF) | 0.1% |
| Relative strength (RSI) | 46 |
| Avg. volume (thou.) | 1 |
| Turnover | 0.3% |
| Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.15% |
| ADV underlying (mns) | $12,024 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 1 potential alternatives to the Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with GXDW. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
| Benchmark ticker: | GXDW | Expense: | 50 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 3.3% |
| Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs GXDW (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs GXDW (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs GXDW (%) |
| XNAV | FundX Aggressive ETF | 4.4 | 141 | -91 | 4.2 | +0.9 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share ![]() |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
| Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
| EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
| Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
| EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
| Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
| Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
| *Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
| 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
| Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
| Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
| Forward multiple: |
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | |||
| Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
UNDERWEIGHT |
| Below average appreciation potential. A rating of UNDERWEIGHT is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the 2nd quintile (ranking higher than only 20%-40%) of their category. Typically, funds in this category consist of stocks trading at relatively expensive valuations and/or having below-average fundamentals. |
|
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|
||||||||||||||
