First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
|
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
- Fundamentals
- Valuation
- Rating
The First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF tracks an index of global sector and industry ETFs, selected by price momentum and weighted equally. The fund can also allocate to cash in varying amounts based on momentum. |
Category | US Equities |
Fund Sponsor | First Trust |
Website | www.ftportfolios.com |
Inception date | Mar 08, 2016 |
Assets (mns) | $157 |
Currency | USD |
Expense ratio | 88 bp |
Distributions | Quarterly |
Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
Custodian | |
Weighting | Tiered |
Index replication | |
Uses derivatives | No |
Options available | No |
No. of constituents | 7 |
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $177,304 |
Large cap (>$10bn) | 50.9% |
Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 10.9% |
Small cap (<$2bn) | 0.7% |
Developed mkts | 62.5% |
Emerging mkts | 0.0% |
FIRST TRUST ENHANCED SHORT MATURIT | 37.9 % |
FIRST TRUST NASDAQ-100-TECHNOLOGY | 12.7 % |
FIRST TRUST NASDAQ SEMICONDUCTOR E | 12.6 % |
FIRST TRUST INDUSTRIALS/PRODUCER D | 12.5 % |
FIRST TRUST DOW JONES INTERNET IND | 12.4 % |
FIRST TRUST CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY | 11.9 % |
US DOLLAR | 0.0 % | Total | 100.0 % |
---|
0.0 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
Custom date range | Compare to | ||
thru |
Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
5.7% | 6.8% | 6.4% | -- | 7.8% |
versus... | Beta | R-squared |
S&P500 | 0.62 | 70% |
MSCI EAFE | 0.57 | 55% |
MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 0.40 | 29% |
Recent close | $32.64 |
30d moving avg. | $31.54 |
Annualized volatility | 13.2% |
Short interest (ETF) | 0.0% |
Relative strength (RSI) | 80 |
Avg. volume (thou.) | 7 |
Turnover | 0.2% |
Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.34% |
ADV underlying (mns) | $34,191 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 2 potential alternatives to the First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with FVC. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
Benchmark ticker: | FVC | Expense: | 88 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 2.2% |
Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs FVC (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs FVC (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs FVC (%) |
FV | First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 62.1 | 90 | -2 | 4.1 | +1.9 |
KRUZ | Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF | 0.2 | 75 | 13 | 5.0 | +2.8 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024E | 2025E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
*Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
2023 | 2024E | 2025E | |
---|---|---|---|
Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
Forward multiple: |
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | |||
Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
AVOID |
Not worthwhile for most investors. A rating of AVOID is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the lowest quintile (the bottom 20%) of their category. Often, funds in this category consist of stocks with little if any history or expectation of profitability, and as a result our fundamentally-driven analysis may not be relevant. |
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
|
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|