Dimensional World Equity ETF
|
- Description
- Performance
- Comps
Fundamentals
Valuation
Rating
DFAW is an actively managed fund of funds that invests in a broad portfolio of stocks across all market capitalizations globally. |
Category | Global Equities |
Fund Sponsor | Dimensional |
Website | www.dimensional.com/us-en/funds/dfaw/world-equity-etf |
Inception date | Sep 26, 2023 |
Assets (mns) | $639 |
Currency | USD |
Expense ratio | 25 bp |
Distributions |
Regulation | Open-Ended Fund |
Custodian | |
Weighting | |
Index replication | |
Uses derivatives | No |
Options available | Yes |
No. of constituents | 6 |
Wgt avg mkt cap (mns) | $481,143 |
Large cap (>$10bn) | 75.3% |
Mid cap ($2-10bn) | 17.8% |
Small cap (<$2bn) | 6.4% |
Developed mkts | 92.4% |
Emerging mkts | 7.4% |
DFA US CORE EQUITY 2 ETF | 52.4 % |
DFA INTL CORE EQTY 2 ETF | 19.9 % |
DFA US CORE EQUITY 1 ETF | 17.6 % |
DFA EM CORE EQUITY 2 ETF | 8.0 % |
DFA GBL REAL ESTATE ETF | 2.1 % |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 0.1 % | Total | 100.0 % |
---|
![]() |
UNITED STATES | 68.1 % |
![]() |
JAPAN | 4.4 % |
![]() |
BRITAIN | 2.8 % |
![]() |
CANADA | 2.1 % |
![]() |
CHINA | 1.8 % |
![]() |
GERMANY | 1.7 % |
![]() |
SWITZERLAND | 1.7 % |
![]() |
FRANCE | 1.5 % |
![]() |
INDIA | 1.4 % |
![]() |
TAIWAN | 1.2 % |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 

Custom date range | Compare to | ||
thru |
Year-to-date | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Since Incep. |
-1.9% | 4.5% | -- | -- | 11.3% |
versus... | Beta | R-squared |
S&P500 | 0.89 | 86% |
MSCI EAFE | 0.66 | 46% |
MSCI Emg. Mkts. | 0.58 | 18% |
Recent close | $60.43 |
30d moving avg. | $60.28 |
Annualized volatility | 11.9% |
Short interest (ETF) | 0.1% |
Relative strength (RSI) | 43 |
Avg. volume (thou.) | 87 |
Turnover | 0.8% |
Bid/Ask (% of price) | 0.11% |
ADV underlying (mns) | $225,837 |
FINDING ALTERNATIVE FUNDS
Below is a list of 1 potential alternatives to the Dimensional World Equity ETF ETF based on the alternatives' overlap in portfolio holdings with DFAW. Consider funds with lower expense ratios and/or higher ALTAR Score™ ratings as possible alternatives.
Benchmark ticker: | DFAW | Expense: | 25 bp | ALTAR Score™: | 6.7% |
Ticker | Fund Name |
Overlap1 vs DFAW (%) |
Expense ratio (bp) |
Savings vs DFAW (bp) |
ALTAR Score™ (%) |
ALTAR vs DFAW (%) |
EBI | Longview Advantage ETF | 6.4 | 35 | -10 | 6.1 | -0.6 |
1Overlap is the percentage of holdings by weight that are identical. For example, if Fund A has a 2% position in Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Fund B has a 5% position, their overlapping position in AAPL is 2%.
Content on this tab for subscribers only**
RESULTS & ESTIMATES
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sales per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Earnings per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Dividends per share ![]() |
** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Book value per share | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
Sales per share growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | |
EPS growth | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% | **% |
OTHER FUNDAMENTAL METRICS
Long term EPS growth est. | **% | Debt-to-equity | **x | |
Asset turnover | **% | Assets-to-equity | **x |
*Six months ago = 100 |
Content on this tab for subscribers only
VALUATION METRICS
2024 | 2025E | 2026E | |
---|---|---|---|
Price-to-sales | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-earnings | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-cash flow | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-growth | ** | ** | ** |
Price-to-book value | ** | ** | ** |
Yield | ** | ** | ** |
Historical valuation trends
Forward multiple: |
Dimensional World Equity ETF | |||
Relative to: |
S&P500 | MSCI EAFE | MSCI Emg. Mkts. | Other ETF: |
OVERWEIGHT |
Above average appreciation potential. A rating of OVERWEIGHT is assigned to ETFs with ALTAR Scores in the 4th quintile (ranking higher than 60%-80%) of their category. Typically, funds in this category consist of stocks trading at attractive valuations and/or having above-average fundamentals. |
ALTAR Score™
|
MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY
![]() |
CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: FUND CONSTITUENTS
|